Anti-Iran summit might go the way of the Arab NATO

2
230

[ Editor’s Note: This is a bizarre story. The US tries to put on a new big anti-Iran coalition when its big sanctions squeeze is not working like it wanted, and then the attendance response to the Neo-Colonialist’s Unipolar offer is tepid, it claims that the anti-Iran conference is not really an anti-Iran conference.

What kills me is that the people who trot you this cow dung get paid big money, with benefits and pensions, while the rest of us fight back often with primitive tools, but a more just cause, which makes all the difference.

Why should EU countries go when they are hopefully engaged in their illusive Special Purpose Vehicle roll out to handle the payments of US sanction trade with Iran? The EU’s “colonialist” status will be determined by what it does, or does not do here.

Time is running out for the EU. Iran is preparing to begin 20% enrichment with more modern centrifuges to supply all the peaceful reactor and medical needs that it has. It also has engaged in a wide array of barter mechanisms and sanction work arounds, tailor made for specific products and foreign partners.

Despite the sanctions, Iran is continuing to modernize its military to defend its borders from the US coalition air, sea and ground power offensive resources in the Persian Gulf area.

Sure, the Iran economy is struggling, but so are the US and European ones where the Russian Roulette trade approach has come into vogue as to who can threaten who the most, into submission, and still claim to be free democratic countries. You just can’t make this stuff upJim W. Dean ]

Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>

Will the US cancel the summit due to poor attendance?

– First published … January 23, 2019

The Unites States may call off a controversial anti-Iran summit in Poland scheduled for next month as Washington is facing a setback due to a widening international boycott of the gathering, a report says.

Jonathan Cohen, the acting US ambassador to the United Nations, told the UN Security Council on Tuesday that the upcoming meeting in the Polish capital of Warsaw, jointly hosted by the US State Department, wasn’t a “venue to demonize or attack Iran.”

Some European diplomats said US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo may be forced to cancel the conference at the last minute due to “low attendance” or US allies’ refusal to send high-level officials, The Wall Street Journal reported.


Cohen went as far as calling the meeting a “global brainstorming session” with an agenda that revolved around cybersecurity, extremism and humanitarian aid to people trapped in conflicts in Syria and Yemen.

The American envoy insisted that Washington had no plans to use the event as an opportunity to reopen arguments about the 2015 Iran nuclear deal either.

Upon announcing the summit earlier this month, Pompeo said the conference would focus on issues concerning stability and security in the Middle East, including the “important element of making sure that Iran is not a destabilizing influence.”

However, the push to form an international front against Iran was met with cold shoulders.

Ministers from several European Union countries and EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini have indicated that they would skip the summit, which will be held on February 13-14.

Russia also declined the invitation to the Warsaw meeting on Tuesday, with Russian UN Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia calling the event “counterproductive.”

Inviting Iran

Nebenzia said Washington should explain why Iran, as a regional power, wasn’t invited if the conference was really aimed at improving regional stability.

“Attempts to create some kind of military alliances in the region by holding conferences and focusing on having a simplified, unilateral approach that is clearly linked just to Iran are counterproductive,” Nebenzia told the Security Council.

Cohen tried to offer reassurances in response to the international criticism, saying while Iran’s ballistic missile program and regional influence would be discussed, “the scope of the discussion will be much broader than any one country or set of issues.”

According to some diplomats, the Polish foreign minister discussed the meeting with European foreign ministers and reassured them that Warsaw supported Iran’s nuclear agreement and that it planned to give a readout of the meeting to Iran.

Iran’s foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, has denounced the conference as an “anti-Iran circus” and slammed Poland for co-hosting the event with the US State department.

The apparent collapse of the Warsaw meeting is in many ways similar to the unraveling of another anti-Iran attempt by Washington in September. Back then, the White House was forced to broaden an anti-Iran Security Council session hosted by President Donald Trump to include other issues amid world leaders’ disagreement over America’s pressure campaign against Tehran.


EDITORIAL DISCLOSURE
All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

2 COMMENTS

  1. To Jim, who wrote “ Why should EU countries go when they are hopefully engaged in their illusive Special Purpose Vehicle roll out to handle the payments of US sanction trade with Iran? The EU’s “colonialist” status will be determined by what it does, or does not do here. ”

    Something seems to be happening in that regard now:
    https://de.sputniknews.com/politik/20190128323746493-maas-eu-iran/
    German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas made a statement concerning the so called “Special Purpose Vehicle” now on monday in Brussels : “ Germany, France and Great Britain are now reeady to implement the plan imminently ” (unmittelbar)

  2. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/nov/09/mek-iran-revolution-regime-trump-rajavi Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, argued that the MEK was on the list of terrorist organisations and should be treated as such. But Iran hawks, including then secretary of defence, Donald Rumsfeld, and vice-president Dick Cheney, argued that the MEK should be used as a weapon against the Islamic republic – the next target in the neoconservative roadmap for remaking the Middle East. (“Boys go to Baghdad, but real men go to Tehran,” was their half-joking refrain.) s the US occupation of Iraq collapsed into a nightmarish civil war, the American right increasingly blamed Iran for the country’s disintegration. Senior politicians openly called for bombing the Islamic republic, amid growing panic over Iran’s nuclear programme – the existence of which had first been exposed by the MEK in what the BBC called a “propaganda coup” for the group. (Several experts on Israeli intelligence have reported that Mossad passed these[ forged ??????, By Way of Deception We Do Do War] documents to the MEK.) By 2007, US news outlets were reporting that Bush had signed a classified directive authorising “covert action” inside Iran.

Comments are closed.